Talk:the company

the company
That sense exists at company already, so is this page wrong, or that one? -- Liliana • 17:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, now. --Mglovesfun (talk) 17:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * [edit conflict] Hard-redirect to company (but don't delete, as it's generally used with the. In fact, a couple of obvious searches (e.g. ) don't turn up any evidence of its use without the, so probably the definition line at [ [company]] should include ). &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * “an intelligence agency”? My understanding, from espionage novels, shows, and movies, is that “the Company” specifically means the CIA (and their training camp is “the Farm”). Can you verify it being used for any other intelligence agency? ~ Robin 18:05, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * That's my experience also FWIW. In any event, that doesn't affect the current nomination, does it? &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 18:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Having a main entry at the company misleadingly excludes attributive use, eg, "a company aircraft", "a company front". DCDuring TALK 18:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Equinox ◑ 21:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Redirected. DAVilla 04:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect is okay for me too. --Mglovesfun (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)