Talk:things'll

things'll
Seems a lot less defensible than it'll: and slightly less than these'll: or one'll:, since things: isn't even a pronoun. To me it's more comparable with something like Mary'll:, which we probably should not be striving to include. The apostrophe denotes the "look-up break", i.e. finding things: and 'll: would not be a challenge. Equinox ◑ 23:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I like the idea of pronouns "yes", other things, including determiners and numbers "no". Pronouns "no" would be fine, too, though. Delete. "Three'll get you five that someone'll disagree." DCDuring TALK 02:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, since it isn't a word, I don't know how it meets CFI. Certainly not "all words in all languages". Mglovesfun (talk) 16:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Fails, deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)