Talk:tidal current

RFD discussion: February–September 2018
A current that's tidal. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The def in the entry is OK. I would keep this. DonnanZ (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you voting keep because the def in the entry is correct? How is that relevant? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 13:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I am voting "keep" because it should be kept, and I may be able to find a translation or two. DonnanZ (talk) 14:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, because it should be deleted. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * IMO, that is terribly negative, why don't you add some translations like I have? It is no more SOP than and other terms at . In any case, I think Metaknowledge was targeting entries created by one particular user, but it doesn't mean it should be deleted. DonnanZ (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep using the lemming heuristic; is in Merriam-Webster. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Kept. No consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 01:59, 25 September 2018 (UTC)