Talk:to look completely baffled

RFD discussion: August 2018
Bad entry name, no content except a translation table, sum of parts. SemperBlotto (talk) 05:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The to is certainly wrong. Could move to but I still question who would make use of such an entry... I'd have to say delete or move... somewhere. Maybe the creator can find a better name for it. Equinox ◑ 05:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I was bold and deleted it. SemperBlotto (talk) 14:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * That's a good collocation to put in a usage example (or citation) at baffle or baffled. DCDuring (talk) 21:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)