Talk:tomara que

RFD discussion: July 2018–February 2019
Seems SOP to me, for the same reason that we don't have Spanish ojalá que, but I could be missing something. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The only other interjection that AFAIR behaves like this is, and very rarely, so this is certainly information that we need to mention somewhere. It is more similar to verbs like and  than interjections. A redirect to  + usage notes works, but I have no preference.
 * Note that the usage is different from interjections like, , and  that are either used alone or with que + a phrase with a verb in the indicative tense. These certainly don’t need separate entries with que, but tomara que requires special consideration. — Ungoliant (falai) 13:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Both "tomara" and "tomara que" are related terms, indeed. However, they are syntactically different. "Tomara" is an interjection -- it works fine on its own. On the other hand, "tomara que" is a phrase, used with a verb in the subjunctive mood. I don't think there is any need for a specific entry for "ojalá que", because "ojalá" can be used alone (as an interjection) or with a sentence (as a phrase) with or without "que". Conversely, when "tomara" is used as a phrase it is required to use "que" every time. CaiusSPQR (talk) 00:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


 * RFD passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)