Talk:tomorrow's

RFD discussion: March–April 2023
SOP: The definitions given do not convey additional figurate or idiomatic meaning beyond the sum of their parts. Some previous discussion here: Tea_room/2023/March – Guitarmankev1 (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

yesterday's
Same as above. – Guitarmankev1 (talk) 18:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

today's
Same as above. – Guitarmankev1 (talk) 18:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep all per WT:THUB. Catonif (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)


 * On one hand, we need to have some entry to put translations in, but on the other hand, that could be crastinal, and hesternal and hodiernal. And although the word tomorrow's, yesterday's, etc is more common than crastinal, hesternal (etc), is anyone going to think to look up tomorrow's, especially if they've ever tried to look anything else up before and have noticed we don't include possessives? I'm not sure; I notice hesternal and crastinal have more pageviews (but yesterday's and tomorrow's are probably too new for a fair comparison). Abstain for now. - -sche (discuss) 20:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Users looking up hesternal don't do that to find a translation. They look it up in the hope of finding out what the flipping heck it is supposed to mean. --Lambiam 21:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep all since they've now been tagged as THUBs and the alternatives mentioned above are rare. Per WT:THUB, "The existence of a rare single-word English synonym of the considered English term does not disqualify the considered English term". —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 20:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep all: With all of the updates that have been made to the articles since they were nominated, these entries in much better shape now. Thanks everybody. – Guitarmankev1 (talk) 02:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

RFD-kept all. Catonif (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)