Talk:toneless final syllable variant

Link would help
I agree that the phrase "toneless final syllable variant" should link somewhere rather than forcing users to Google it to get to this talk page as I did. Neither of the suggested Mandarin terms seem to mean quite the same thing though.

DenisHowe (talk) 07:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

My thoughts--
This is a distinct concept that needs specific definition- the standard wording of wiktionary articles to describe the condition of multiple pronunciations with no meaning change is toneless final syllable variant- expand the pronunciation box at the 聰明 page for an example. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

RFD discussion: February–April 2018
This looks SOP and encyclopaedic, not lexical. No idea about the Chinese 重·次輕詞語 (of which it's the English translation) though. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not a translation for 重·次輕詞語, which is also SOP. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 21:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

This is a distinct concept that needs specific definition- the standard wording of wiktionary articles to describe the condition of multiple pronunciations with no meaning change is toneless final syllable variant- expand the pronunciation box at the 聰明 page for an example. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This is not the same as 重·次輕詞語 (though here in Wiktionary it seems to serve a similar function). "toneless final syllable variant" is literally a variant pronunciation in which the final syllable is toneless/neutral tone. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 04:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * created a new page at 重·次輕 --Geographyinitiative (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)