Talk:traceur

Should this be moved to traceur ? Mutante 11:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Equinox ◑ 16:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

RFV discussion: February–April 2016
Guess who. -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 07:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Google Books returns plenty of results. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * This is for the Spanish section. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It turns out, though, that there are more than enough hits to be found with the proper filtering: here, here, and here to start with. The entry is wrong about it being uncountable, with the plural, traceurs, attested here, here and here. There also seems to be a feminine form, traceuse, but all the Spanish hits seem to be mentions. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Of course, sorry, I didn't even notice the Spanish section. I was wondering why this was RFVed! Andrew Sheedy (talk) 04:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Cited by Chuck Entz above? Spanish entry created by LWC noted for shoddy lexicography is being nominated, for the record. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV-pased per the citations linked-to above. - -sche (discuss) 16:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)