Talk:transage

RFV discussion: March 2018
Really? SemperBlotto (talk) 15:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I don't see any hits on Issuu or Usenet or Google Books (although Transage seems to be the name of a certain alloy and/or company manufacturing said alloy). - -sche (discuss) 16:36, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

transager
As above. SemperBlotto (talk) 15:53, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I don't see any hits on Issuu or Usenet, and on Google Books I see only one mention-y one from 2016 ("he considers himself a “transager” and lives as a six-year-old") in the in-my-experience typical usage context of 'right-wing parlance trying to discredit/mock transgenderness', and one jocular(?) one from 2017 "'You could've just told him.' 'How? What, I like dressing up as my gran? I'm a transager?' 'You're being ridiculous. Take this seriously.'" - -sche (discuss) 16:36, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Just delete PaM entries on sight; he is banned for a reason and should not have the right to clutter RFV with his inventions. Equinox ◑ 16:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I've deleted both. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 16:40, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

RFV discussion: November 2022
This failed RfV in 2018. I'm not sure if the term has gained any traction since then. It does have some relevant Google results, many of which are decrying the concept as illegitimate. One of the hits is a Simple English Wikipedia article, apparently created by the same user. Anyhow, even if the term is attestable in some way, there are currently 5 definitions on the entry (seemingly based on the structure of the entry ), and I suspect that some of those, especially the later ones, may not be citable. 98.170.164.88 05:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The author of this entry also created the page (copying the structure of the entry ). I initially applied rfv, but after a little investigation this latter term seems to be easily citable from psychological literature; I have added a quotation. 98.170.164.88 05:48, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The definition could use improvement, though, since the IP copied it m.m. from gender identity i.e. was defining the above-mentioned bogeyman rather than the real psychology concept. I find various psychology sources defining it as one's assessment of one's position in the aging process or one's identification with an age group, generation (Boomers, Gen X, ...), or category (youthful, older than other people, ...). So that it doesn't slip through the cracks if this thread gets archived, I've gone ahead and removed the copy-pasted definition and added a rfdef seeking the actual definition. - -sche (discuss) 09:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Seeing the comical listing of "age" as an alternative form and "transgender" as a derived term, I've just deleted it as an inept copy-paste job and as having previously failed RFV. - -sche (discuss) 09:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)