Talk:transplantar

RFV discussion
Spanish section. Anon points out that the RAE only accepts trasplantar:. However, I seem to see some usage online. Can anyone try and cite this? < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 08:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * It's citeable — — but I wonder if it's best considered an uncommon misspelling/typo. I notice that the first of those cites uses "trasplantar" in the following sentence, and the second one uses the noun "trasplante" earlier in the same sentence. (I suppose it's possible that someone could have noun=trasplante, verb=transplantar, but it seems doubtful.) —Ruakh TALK 15:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm currently leaning toward citing and keeping this, but changing the sense-line to “ ” Anyone disagree? —Ruakh TALK 18:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I would keep it. If anything it should be moved to RFD like fetii was. But I think we should keep it unless it's incredibly rare. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Yep that sounds like a reasonable solution, let's do it. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 22:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * ✅ —Ruakh TALK 14:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)