Talk:tuyệt

RFC discussion: September 2017
The content looks dubiously similar to the Chinese entry for 絕. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 04:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No, it looks like a word-for-word duplicate, with the senses rearranged and given POS headers (I think they changed too far-->far, but that's it). That's a copyvio and a violation of the attribution requirements of our license. It's also outrageous to be adding a whole entry in a language that's not even in their Babel as one they speak using this kind of crude fakery to fill in the blanks. This is part of a pattern where they add something, then think about whether it was a good idea, and not much different from their practice of making mass edits from sources that they don't understand very well.
 * I've deleted the entry as a copyvio and blocked them for 3 days. I have a hunch they're too young to understand what they're doing, or it would have been much longer. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)