Talk:uḷūka

RFV discussion: July–October 2021
To me, this looks like a mistake in the "New Concise Pali English Dictionary" for, which better matches the Prakrit as well as Sanskrit forms. Googling found me only one example in a Pali sentence, in a Vietnamese Pali textbook. The spelling with the dot below is quite common in modern wordlists.

On the other hand, interchange of 'ḷ' and 'l' is a common error in manuscripts, so common that for some words, we don't know which is correct. As it has made its way into a widely used dictionary, perhaps we should record it as a misspelling (or even simply an alternative form) because the dictionary may frequently induce the misspelling when text is proof-read. --RichardW57 (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This looks like a misspelling. The "New Concise" seems to be the only dictionary that includes this word. --Frigoris (talk) 08:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)