Talk:udonis

RFV discussion: November 2015
Character trait of amazing people, etc. Sounds made up. The linked Wikipedia article has no relevance at all. Equinox ◑ 21:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm certain it was made up by a fan of the basketball player, trying to turn him into an adjective indicating all of the qualities he ascribes to Mr. Haslem. I suggest converting this into an RfD.  The contributor's documentation isn't nearly udonis enough.  P Aculeius (talk) 22:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * It would not make sense to convert this to an RFD—the issue is not whether the term is idiomatic, but rather whether it is attested at all. RFV is the appropriate place for it. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 23:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * There isn't any attestation, not even a shred of it, and there wouldn't be, because the editor who added it just made up the whole entry. This isn't a dubious sense of a word, or even a dubious word.  It's pure fiction, and obvious pure fiction at that.  I believe the relevant policies are called complete rubbish and self-promotion under WT:DELETE.  P Aculeius (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Is this an obvious enough hoax to be speedily deleted? That's what we did for the Microsoft definition which said 'poor, slow, unusable' (etc.). Renard Migrant (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * That's my opinion, but not having enough experience with the process, I thought I would defer to the regulars. If my interpretation of WT:DELETE is wrong, I won't do any damage.  P Aculeius (talk) 18:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * No Google hits for uncapitalised form that I could see. Zero hits on Google ngram viewer. Deleted SemperBlotto (talk) 07:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)