Talk:underget

RFV discussion: June 2022–February 2023
RFV two senses:


 * 1) "(transitive, obsolete) To understand; perceive."
 * 2) "(transitive) To receive; undertake; get at; find out." There are two current citations but they both look unambiguously like NNES error, and the 1998 one does not even seem to match the definition.

Note the OED only has hyphenated under-get, defined as "(transitive) To catch up with, overtake" and having a single citation from 1390. Equinox ◑ 16:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I've split the entry into 2, 1 for Middle English, and another for Modern English . I did not add the senses above. If they are verified we can add them at that time I suppose. Leasnam (talk) 13:28, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't understand: where did the previous revisions of the page go? I only see your latest changed revision in the history. Nothing shown for page deletion either. Equinox ◑ 14:50, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * It was moved to undergeten, then recreated at the original spelling. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. Leasnam (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Looks ✅ Ioaxxere (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

RFV Failed, the original senses were already deleted. Ioaxxere (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)