Talk:unmanned aerial vehicle

unmanned aerial vehicle
Just what it says on the tin. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - can we delete this Metaknowledge guys admin powers, he seems to have a bad case of OCD! WritersCramp (talk) 21:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey WritersCramp why don't you judge entries on their merits instead of on who created them? Renard Migrant (talk) 21:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It doesn't even have a definition, it links to UAV which is the initialism. Sometimes initialisms link to the expanded form, this one links to the contracted form! Speedy for no usable content? Renard Migrant (talk) 21:32, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DCDuring TALK 21:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. This seems like a vehicle that is both unmanned and aerial. There is a very slight "set-phrase"-ness to it from the fact that "aerial unmanned vehicle" is almost nonexistent, but I think this stems from the commonness and the rhythm of "aerial vehicle". bd2412 T 14:17, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even the definition states the obvious. --Romanophile (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)