Talk:untrigintillion

RFV discussion: November 2019–January 2021
Created by the same editor as the other "large numerals" entries above, who still creates them without any citations. &mdash; surjection &lang;?&rang; 09:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we should move these to the dictionary-only terms appendix, or even give them an appendix of their own. Kiwima (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * And shouldn't this be, which has one citation? Kiwima (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 *  un trigintillion is the form you’d expect, in analogy with . However, whereas undecillion is from existing +, there is no Latin numeral *ūntriginta; the Latin term for XXXI is triginta (et) unus/-a/-um, literally “thirty (and) one”. Pages , , , ..., were all deleted in 2006; the latter even again in 2015.  --Lambiam 22:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I've found two citations: Citations:untrigintillion. I like the idea of an appendix for the unattestable ones. (The citations at Citations:sexvigintillion can be used to attest many others.) - -sche (discuss) 08:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

RFV-failed. I created tthe appendix for large numbers and replaced this entry with a redirect to that appendix. Kiwima (talk) 04:45, 5 January 2021 (UTC)