Talk:usor

RFV discussion
A Latin neologism meaning "user". This seems to be pretty recent, and I've also seen usuarius, but I don't think that either of those is citeable. Note that we interpret the CFI to require 3 uses for a Latin term only used in medieval times or later, like. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * usor tends to be used fairly regularly on the Latin Wikimedia sites (eg. Vicipaedia, Victionary, Vicimedia), although I can't find any outside usage. It's probably idiosyncratic.
 * On another note, I found this interesting discussion about whether usor or usuarius should be used. - Znex (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Failed. Hate to be the executioner of an important WM term, but if it’s uncitable, it’s uncitable. — Ungoliant (Falai) 11:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)