Talk:uuyn

RFD discussion: September 2021
As we do not have an entry for ƿynn, either. If this has to be really kept, then the same should apply to ƿynn. ·~  dictátor · mundꟾ  07:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Apples and oranges. We had a vote to remove Old English entries using ⟨ƿ⟩. This is a Modern English entry using ⟨uu⟩, so the vote has no bearing on it. Move to RFV to determine whether this spelling is ever used in post-1500 English. —Mahāgaja · talk 08:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * So can ƿynn be created as a Modern English entry if it’s attested in literature? ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  11:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * In that spelling, compliant with WT:CFI (three unrelated attestations in durably archived media), yes. —Mahāgaja · talk 15:46, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

RFV discussion: September–October 2021
Tagged but not listed. Is this spelling found in (at least three durably archived) Modern English texts? —Mahāgaja · talk 10:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 03:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)