Talk:verab-

RFD discussion: August–October 2021
German. Tagged by 2003:DE:3720:3796:C417:65D5:8E69:E298 on 29 August, not listed: “ +, e.g. =  + ( + )”. J3133 (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I’m more inclined to analyze =  +  +  and similarly e.g.  =  +  +, but  is undoubtedly  + abreichen. In any case, the bracketing separates ver- from ab-, so the apposition of these two prefixes is incidental and not constitutive.  --Lambiam 13:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * At first I wanted to disagree but seeing as all verab- words are semantically similar to the word without ver- but not without ab- (ver-abreden, ver-abschieden, ver-abscheuen, ver-absolutieren) I'm inclined to agree with the removal. There is a point to be made about verabsäumen though which semantically coincides with versäumen (and there is no absäumen). --Fytcha (talk) 00:26, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete.--Akletos (talk) 08:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)