Talk:vidunderleg

RFV discussion: January–August 2016
I believe it should be spelt vedunderleg. I have just sent a message to User:Njardarlogar about this and am awaiting a reply. Donnanz (talk) 12:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That's the only correct spelling according to the dictionary, but it appears to have less Google hits than vidunderleg (1, 2), so it's probably worth a misspelling of entry. --Njardarlogar (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Re Google hits, I was beginning to suspect that. Anyway, treating it as a misspelling is probably the best solution. Donnanz (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I have included it as usage notes, added a couple of references, and removed the RFV. Job done, I hope. Donnanz (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Don't be deceived by the inaccurate Google hit counts. If you actually click through the result pages, you will notice that "vidunderleg" has 30 pages of results (299 total results), while "vedunderleg" has 34 pages of results (331 total results). --WikiTiki89 19:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It appears that this is resolved. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * But - since this is patently a misspelling, shouldn't this page only be ?--Barend (talk) 14:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)