Talk:weak-tea

RFD discussion: May–July 2020
Attributive form of weak tea. Deletion is warranted per our vote to remove attributive form entries. Imetsia (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I don't support the notion that all hyphenated attributive forms should be removed, but I have no objection to the removal of this one. DonnanZ (talk) 08:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all entries "that define hyphenated compounds merely as an attributive form of the individual components", per vote. Mihia (talk) 21:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I would never say "delete all"; there are some that should remain, so they should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. DonnanZ (talk) 09:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mihia. PUC – 20:06, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete according to our previous decision concerning hyphenated attributive forms. — SGconlaw (talk) 18:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This seems to be a clear case per the lamentable Votes/2019-05/Excluding self-evident "attributive form of" definitions for hyphenated compounds. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * RFD failed. PseudoSkull (talk) 06:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)