Talk:well-rested

well-rested
well-rested ?--Rockpilot 00:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Unsure. It's quite a productive prefix - well-trained, well-exercised, well-fed, well-done, well-written, well-travelled, well-known and well-behaved are among some of the more common ones. I am not quite certain about the criteria to include them here. Where is the line drawn? Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 01:10, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Are there any speakers who productively produce "more well-X" instead of "better-X"? If not, then I imagine that use of "more well-X", for a given X, indicates that a speaker is thinking of "well-X" as a single unit, rather than as "well" + "X". I dunno. —Ruakh TALK 02:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I suspect the answer to your first question, Ruakh, is "yes", but I have no evidence. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, as a single attested word. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 13:39, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a single word, but well + rested linked with a hyphen as opposed to a space. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:43, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * wellrested is also common, so WT:COALMINE may be relevant. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 13:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: I would be happy to declare all hyphenated compounds single words for the sake of CFI, on equal footing with closed compounds. A related discussion is in of April, 2011 (later to be found at talk:ex-Scientologist). --Dan Polansky 21:13, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't.  Delete (unless COALMINE applies, in which case, of course, keep). &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It does satisfy COALMINE. Most of the hits at are actually instances of well-&lt;newline&gt;rested (where Google Books interprets the hyphen as being solely due to the newline, so indexes it as "wellrested" rather than "well-rested"), and some are instances of well&lt;space&gt;rested where Google Books failed to see the space; but enough are actual instances of wellrested. For example: . —Ruakh TALK 18:10, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

kept per WT:COALMINE -- Liliana • 04:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)