Talk:wierd

RFV discussion
"Common misspelling of weird." TeleComNasSprVen 10:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd imagine that as misspellings go, this is a common one. Side note, looks like it's definitely attestable in Dutch and as Scots for weird. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Cited. Equinox ◑ 10:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, citing it is not the problem, this should be at RFD. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 11:12, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * But since we have a ton of misspelling entries, a vote on their existence might be more productive than individual RFVs/RFDs. Equinox ◑ 11:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

RFV passed. Thanks for the cites, Equinox! —Ruakh TALK 22:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC)