Talk:wiki-

RFV discussion: January 2020
Product of Wikimedia Foundation. DTLHS (talk) 02:40, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Is this really a request for verification? We all know "wikimedia", "wikipedia", "wikispecies", etc - which gives us three words right there. Perhaps a request for deletion would be more appropriate. Kiwima (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * OK. DTLHS (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I have RFDed it. Equinox ◑ 13:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

RFD discussion: January–March 2020
"Product of Wikimedia Foundation: Wikipedia, Wiktionary, etc." This is an element of some historically recent brand names, hardly a morphological prefix for a dictionary. Equinox ◑ 13:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I think this should be broadened to something like "product using wiki software", and based on things like "wikidictionary", not brand names like "Wikipedia" which could be viewed as a blend. Or perhaps all possible instances could be viewed as simply blends or compounds with wiki instead, which would leave no reason for this entry at all. Anyway, "Wiktionary" (mentioned in the definition) doesn't contain the full element "wiki"/"wiki-" at all. - -sche (discuss) 23:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * So, delete on the grounds that (the definition is wrongly narrow, and) things ostensibly formed with this can adequately or better be considered compounds or blends with wiki instead. - -sche (discuss) 23:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Canonicalization (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)


 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)