Talk:wikistorm

RFV discussion: July–August 2018
None of the cites seem to be durably archived. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The first (Sep 2013) is Fox News, which I suspect is durably archived. The third (2014) is MIT press, which I am sure is durably archived. I added a fourth (2015) which is also durably archived. The fifth(Feb 2016) is Penn State News, which may well be durably archived. The sixth (Dec 2016) is published in an academic journal (although it has the same author as the third, so only one of them would count). I added another 2016 from a durably archived source. The last one (2017) is from the University of South Florida Scholar Commons, which I believe is also durably archived.


 * All told, I would say this is cited - at least for wikistorming as a noun. The verb is more questionable. Kiwima (talk) 22:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with all of your calls, but there are three books attesting the noun, so it looks like it's good (the verb, not so much). I also think the definition needs a change, because all the cites seem to focus on feminism. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Etymology is an interesting point, since to storm something is a violent military attack, but it's possible that it comes from another collaborative origin like "brainstorm". Equinox ◑ 18:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

RFV-resolved The verb fails, the noun (wikistorming) passes. Kiwima (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)