Talk:wikt

RFV discussion: October–November 2012
-- Liliana • 15:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The only book hits I could find were a large number of Wikipedia-derived books which use it in the index. I'm guessing indices don't meet the CFI, but I'm only guessing at that. Spinning Spark  20:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, do any of these instances 'convey meaning'? I think that's the test. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * No more than any book index entry usually conveys meaning. Such Wikipedia-derived books have machine-generated indices which are pretty devoid of meaning (or usefulness) anyway -  is a typical example. Note that both "Wiktionary" and "Wikt" are used, presumably depending on how the original editor typed it in the interwiki link. Spinning Spark  07:49, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * They may possibly convey meaning, but they're not independent, being derived from Wikipedia. -- Liliana • 20:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 08:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)