Talk:willie-wag

RFD discussion
This would fail no doubt RFV. --Perriette (talk) 23:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Do not RFV. Delete and do not re-enter without at least one valid citation. Then we can talk about RFV. DAVilla 03:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This is supposed to have words with some rational degree of usage. Collect (talk) 14:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Move to Urban Dictionary. --WikiTiki89 14:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Moved to RFV, where it belongs if there is a doubt about attestation. I have never heard of "rational degree of usage", nor did . --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

RFV discussion: November–December 2012
Appears unattested. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * As I noted elsewhere, there appears to be no actual usage with anything remotely near the meaning claimed. A "willie-wag-tail" is a kind of bird, and Robert Burns used the term in a poem, but I canna conceive of it having the meaning asserted here at all.   And I looked assiduously for such a usage.  Fail. Epic fail. Collect (talk) 02:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 00:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)