Talk:wipe one's nose

Deletion debate
Was listed on WT:RFV, but since the definition is clearly attestable I moved it here. Strong delete, what's the idiomatic meaning here? Mglovesfun (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * thefreedictionary.com doesn't seem to suggest any idiomatic use: see here. So yes, delete. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 12:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see that that's a sufficient argument. Nonetheless, it seems to me, too, to be the sum of its parts: delete. &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 15:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * As evidently no one really cares enough about ESL and language-learning for normal people (like parents) to trouble to develop a practical approach to developing and maintaining a useful phrasebook, delete. A usage example in the imperative at "wipe" and/or "nose" should suffice for someone learning English, at least for decoding. DCDuring TALK 16:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Added "You should never wipe your nose with your friend's sleeve" to wipe. &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 16:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've started Appendix:English phrasebook and added "wipe one's nose" to it. This should make it less painful to clean up the phrasebook category by sending many of its items to RFD per their being sum of parts, as the deleted items can be filed to the appendix. However, the appendix does not provide translation.
 * I admit that dictionaries usually do not play the role of an English textbook, so they are usually do not host common phrases that are sum of parts. --Dan Polansky 09:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 19:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)