Talk:witness intimidation

RFD discussion: January–March 2019
It being a crime in the US is not really part of the definition, and I don't think it affects whether it's sum of parts. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - seems SoP to me. SemperBlotto (talk) 05:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP and the definition also appears too narrow, unless intimidation of a witness to compel a change in a testimony isn't covered by the U.S. law. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  13:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Witness intimidation is also a crime under UK law, so the definition is definitely too narrow in more than one respect. --Lambiam 16:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. Per utramque cavernam 18:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Many sequences of words which are codified as names of crimes are still SOP, like "driving with a revoked license" or "encouraging or assisting [a] crime". - -sche (discuss) 20:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — SGconlaw (talk) 04:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)