Talk:woodland

RFV-passed
See this discussion. — Beobach 02:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

woodland
Rfv-sense: "Of or pertaining to a creature or object growing, living, or existing in a woodland ". Seems like attributive use of the noun. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, no more adjectival than office in office block. Equinox ◑ 21:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, as above. Pingku 13:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Not really a vote. We are just waiting for someone to show that it is used as an adjective. See English adjectives. I suppose we could interpret the vote as a vote for deletion ASAP after the 30 days an RfVed item is supposed to get. In which case, I agree. DCDuring TALK 16:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep. Pingku 12:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. Equinox ◑ 11:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Unstriking, sorry. I was just looking at this the other day, and can definitely cite it, at least in reference to birds. (Sorry — it's been months since anyone else has helped out here significantly, so I'd gotten in the habit of taking my time with harder words. I do appreciate your help, though!) —Ruakh TALK 11:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Cited, at least in a subsense: in the cite that Visviva added, and in all the cites that I could find, it's specifically describing birds. (Obviously "woodland" often appears as an attributive modifier describing things other than birds, but I'm speaking here only of clearly adjectival cites.) —Ruakh TALK 15:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. I don't see why we wouldn't accept the definition as written, possibly with an "especially of birds." DCDuring TALK 19:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

RFV passed. —Ruakh TALK 22:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)