Talk:work path

RFV
All I can see on Google book search is something to do with Photoshop. SemperBlotto 14:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * In a search at bgc for '"work path" -intitle:photoshop' I found 3 hits for this sense, but in so doing became skeptical that this should be included. There are numerous context-dependent readings of the collocation, all of which seemed utterly transparent if I knew something about the context. On further investigation for a couple of the more technical cases, the context also made the semantics of the combination transparent. DCDuring TALK 15:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I suppose the proper course of action is to submit a RFD, then, although at the moment it is also uncited and therefore RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 03:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)