Talk:worriable

RFD discussion: December 2016–March 2017
Hi, This word may be rare but is not a protologism, it has been used quite widely on the Internet. Concerning "demouse", it's the same as "derat", which has an entry here. 193.54.167.180 15:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Please add CFI-compliant citations to Citations:worriable and Citations:demouse. Once there are three independent citations spanning more than a year, the entries can be undeleted. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The first one can be undeleted, the second is difficult to find because of "demo use" parasiting the research. 193.54.167.180 17:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * has been cited, hasn't (yet). SemperBlotto (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It is now, I had to remove the "http//" because some silly filter disallow it (then, how to insert a link ???). 193.54.167.180 17:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)


 * RFD kept on worriable and demouse; both are RFV matter and RFD was only used to restore them. Furthermore, no consensus for deletion is found in this RFD. However, Citations:demouse contains only 2 citations unlike what WT:ATTEST requires so I am sending it to RFV. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)