Talk:wrongs darker than death or night

wrongs darker than death or night
Just a line from a Shelley poem, once used as the title of a Star Trek episode. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 09:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete But don't we yet have partisans advocating inclusion of lovely turns of phrase? DCDuring TALK 11:10, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's a quotation, albeit a nice one. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:11, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Not so fast - would these be considered reliable citations? &  &  &  ---&gt; Tooironic 21:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * They seem reliable, but they just seem to use it as a citation (in inverted commas, no less). IMO these citations support a delete more than they support a keep. That said, if there were some figurative meaning other than the literal (albeit poetic one) I could reconsider. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, delete. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 22:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to vote delete. But, if it is retained, there are loads of Shakespeare quotes (and others) used as titles of books etc. SemperBlotto 22:13, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * And then there are all the interesting non-idiomatic phrases used for book titles, song titles, band names, and political slogans. DCDuring TALK 22:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that's the point Semper was making. Mglovesfun (talk) 02:00, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Our criteria should require that in citation the quote not be used as a quote if we are to include such things. DAVilla 21:58, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that we distinguish in this regard between "use" and "mention". I certainly hope so. DCDuring TALK 23:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Good point. Would you RFV then? DAVilla 06:48, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)