Talk:wyjść po angielsku

wyjście po angielsku
The minimal idiomatic part is (which I now added; improvements to the definition are welcome), because the verb may be replaced with any synonym, like, ,  without any loss of meaning, making this term SOP. (Alternatively, one might consider synonym substitutions as alternative forms of this term, but I think it is not feasible to do so.) — Keφr 20:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete both. Since there hasn't been any objections, can the entries can be deleted? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:19, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Supporters of deletion should consider keeping this at least as a redirect. I don't think the replaceability of the verb with synonyms is a very convincing SOP argument. Imagine we would be documenting French leave at French, and claim "French leave" is a combination of "French" in that sense and "leave"; this proposal reeks of something like that. Some searches:, , ; I get 137 hit, 9 hits and 1 hit. --Dan Polansky (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I have no problems with redirects. "Wyjść po angielsku" <> "French leave" but = "to take a French leave", where the idiomatic part is "po angielsku" with various verb combinations, with "wyjść" being the most common one. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep This phrase has the idiomatic meaning only when combined with a verb / noun that has a sense similar to "leave, exit, go away". I think the proper solution here is redirects or Template:alternative form of, like for the many variants of the proverb "one swallow does not a summer make". --Tweenk (talk) 03:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Kept for lack of consensus to delete. bd2412 T 01:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC)