Talk:your welcome

RFD discussion: October–November 2017
Redundant; already got this misspelling at. Equinox ◑ 01:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, even though it's an all-too-common error. What interests me is the classification at your, should it not just be a usage note? DonnanZ (talk) 09:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Or perhaps better still, a hard redirect to . DonnanZ (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Generally speaking I'm not keen on hard redirects of misspellings since users may not notice that they have been redirected, and may remain unaware that what they typed was misspelled. Mihia (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not keen on hard redirects either as I feel they can be misused, but I thought it may be OK here. However I accept your point. DonnanZ (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Barytonesis (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete/Hard redirect. Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * RFD failed and converted to a hard redirect, as I see no harm in that. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)