Talk:zettagramme

RFV discussion: October 2011–February 2012
British, rare, blahblahblah... the fact is that nobody has used it in writing. Equinox ◑ 02:32, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No hits on either Google Groups of Google Books. I will be disappointed to see these spellings deleted. --Pilcrow 02:39, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not a spelling issue: even zettagram is probably not attestable. We've had previous discussions about these "theoretically acceptable but not actually used" units. Equinox ◑ 02:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I've found two and only two cites for zettagram, if you want to have at it.--Prosfilaes 19:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Soft redirect all of these to Appendix:SI units, and add some content there about prefixes and suffixes commonly used in other languages. bd2412 T 19:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. - -sche (discuss) 02:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)