Talk:zugrunderichten

zugrunderichten
That is a wrong spelling of zugrunde richten, see duden.--Bigbossfarin (talk) 10:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Where in that link does it says that zugrunderichten is a wrong spelling of zugrunde richten? Mglovesfun (talk) 10:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * There is a section "alternative spelling" (Alternative Schreibung) and the term zugrunderichten is not listed. --Bigbossfarin (talk) 10:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * So it doesn't say that this isn't a word then. Right. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It fails to say what we say, namely that zugrunderichten is an alternative spelling of zugrunde richten. The burden of proof is on us to show that the single-word spelling is an alternative spelling. I'd say this is a case for WT:RFV, and if the single-word spelling is attested, we still have to decide whether it's an or a, the border between which is not clearly defined. —Angr 11:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, couldn't agree more. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, RFV this if desired. Keep here. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. @Bigbossfarin: English Wiktionary includes words based on available evidence rather than based on what authoritative dictionaries say. Thus, the absence of the term in Duden is merely a hint that a look at evidence could be worthwhile. Relevant searches: ; Google Ngram Viewer for German: zugrunderichten,zugrunde richten. The Ngram search suggests that the spelling is rather common. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

kept. Send to RFV if desired. -- Liliana • 07:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)