Template talk:R:CDIAL

After you edit, clicking on the links shows text when the second parameter (the entry number) is provided. Searching by entry number rather than headword is especially important for entries that are in small text (such as text under text). Kutchkutch (talk) 14:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Your efforts are appreciated but the CDIAL database doesn't always work when you enter IAST characters in their search. For instance their treatment of, is different. And yes, what Kutchkutch said above is also an issue, plus the template does not work at दुर्मनस् now. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴)  07:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I have reverted my edits and won't try to do anything to this template in the future . Thanks for correcting. Also, I hope there is no problem in these edits of mine (including moving T:R:Apte to T:R:sa:Apte). 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 08:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Sanskrit transliteration without diacritics
Do you know any way of transliterating Sanskrit without diacritics? For a word like मणि, I want this template to link to (which shows both accented and non-accented मणि) instead of, which hides the other मणि which has an accent. In special cases like vāmaná, we'll use parameter "1" as vamana can be both वमन(vomiting) and वामन (dwarf). 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 03:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * is it possible? 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 06:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that'd be possible/worthwhile. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 07:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay, but the template is fine after my edit? 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 07:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * To compare, I reinstated a version from 2019 last edited by AryamanA. Here is what I found: your edits were not causing errors per se but they were not giving the desired results either. Furthermore entering stuff in parameter 2 would earlier (before your edits) work perfectly but now it showed problems. For instance, entering taruṇa would not give anything and the person now had to type in táruṇa. Entering smr̥ta now works but it didn't after your edits. So I have for now let the 2019 version stand as there was no pressing need to change that; it was of course incapable of catching the headword and putting the translit into the search but the template was not doing so good of a job after the edits either. Therefore, also as a precaution against any problem which might have gone undetected by me, I've restored it to the last revision by AryamanA. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 07:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Regarding I won't try to do anything to this template in the future :
 * Your efforts to improve the template are appreciated. However, if you're so inclined to improve the template, instead of experimenting with the template, which is used on thousands of entries, perhaps it would be better to experiment with a user template such as User:शब्दशोधक/R:CDIAL and show how it will work at User:शब्दशोधक/CDIAL. When you can clearly demonstrate that User:शब्दशोधक/R:CDIAL can replace R:CDIAL at User:शब्दशोधक/CDIAL, you could update R:CDIAL at that time. Kutchkutch (talk) 10:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Actually I wanted to make this template working without any extra parameters (although for now that seems impossible even after my so many attempts). And this is a highly visible template, so you could think of protecting is as "only admins and temp editors". 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 11:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Not linking??
Why isn't the entry word linking to the url? I also restored the template to the earlier revision but still it doesn't link. I think before a day or two it was completely fine (or I possibly didn't notice before that), so what's causing the problem? 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 04:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @शांतनु Special:diff/62356634 by User:Sgconlaw. R:hi:McGregor is affected as well. The issue doesn't occur with the earlier version Special:PermanentLink/61089883. Kutchkutch (talk) 06:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)