Template talk:R:es:DRAE

ISBN
I disagree with adding the ISBN. It presents visual noise while adding very little value. There was a discussion on this which I think showed no consensus, but I can be wrong. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Template name
In November 2016, Vivaelcelta moved the remplate from R:DRAE 2001 to R:DRAE. I think it's only reasonable since the edition that we link to online keeps changing. It is essential that we use this template as a further reading and not as a reference, though.

The 2001 template said "Vigésima segunda edición" - 22nd edition.

The template now says 2014, and "Vigésima tercera edición" - 23rd edition.

The current online edition says "Edición del Tricentenario" in a white font in a black horizontal strip, and there is a link at the right with the text "Edición del Tricentenario" that links to, where it says "La 23.ª edición de Diccionario de la lengua española se publicó en octubre de 2014."

--Dan Polansky (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Sense/id linking
(note to future self) All items on the DRAE page have ids (in the form of "57urmg8"), so it would be possible to directly link to a sense by providing the id in the template (id). However, I'm not able to generate URLs with fragments automatically. – Jberkel 20:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I added support for using the id= parameter to jump to the page anchor. This requires specifying the entry name ("pez", in this case) if it's different than the page title:
 * In the case above, since "pez de colores" is really an article and not a sense, so you can just use the full phrase as the entry and it will go to the same page, but with better link text:
 * Links to a specific sense can provide the sense id as the id:
 * JeffDoozan (talk) 19:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Great! I think I tried to put the fragment inside, which didn't work. – Jberkel 19:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * JeffDoozan (talk) 19:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Great! I think I tried to put the fragment inside, which didn't work. – Jberkel 19:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Great! I think I tried to put the fragment inside, which didn't work. – Jberkel 19:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)