Template talk:R:inc:CGMIA

SodhakSH, you would have to put the information within cite-book as Kutchkutch had originally done. - ⸘ - dictātor · mundī  14:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , why? I have converted many templates from cite-book to non-cite-book. 🔥 ಶಬ್ದಶೋಧಕ 🔥 14:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * But why? Nobody asked you to. cite-book should always be used; not for nothing do we have templets. - ⸘ - dictātor · mundī  15:03, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ...and you're doing that, why? Also, can you please tell me the net result of your edit (I'm too tired to tell just by looking at the edit right now)? -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 15:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * R:inc:CGMIA =
 * 1 =
 * 1 =
 * 1 =
 * I did that because of Template talk:R:CDIAL. I don't want any change to cite-book or cite-meta to affect these perfectly fine templates. 🔥 ಶಬ್ದಶೋಧಕ 🔥 15:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Why go for such complexity‽ Writing out TERM is enough. - ⸘ - dictātor · mundī  16:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , this is no complexity, this is simplicity. After these changes, for almost half of the entries, R:CDIAL or R:CDIAL is enough. Many entries don't need an entry no. now. And I believe the entry number should be used only for searching in the dictionary, not for displaying and making the template untidy. 🔥 ಶಬ್ದಶೋಧಕ 🔥 04:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1 =
 * I did that because of Template talk:R:CDIAL. I don't want any change to cite-book or cite-meta to affect these perfectly fine templates. 🔥 ಶಬ್ದಶೋಧಕ 🔥 15:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Why go for such complexity‽ Writing out TERM is enough. - ⸘ - dictātor · mundī  16:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , this is no complexity, this is simplicity. After these changes, for almost half of the entries, R:CDIAL or R:CDIAL is enough. Many entries don't need an entry no. now. And I believe the entry number should be used only for searching in the dictionary, not for displaying and making the template untidy. 🔥 ಶಬ್ದಶೋಧಕ 🔥 04:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , this is no complexity, this is simplicity. After these changes, for almost half of the entries, R:CDIAL or R:CDIAL is enough. Many entries don't need an entry no. now. And I believe the entry number should be used only for searching in the dictionary, not for displaying and making the template untidy. 🔥 ಶಬ್ದಶೋಧಕ 🔥 04:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi. Do you think what User:SodhakSH has been doing is necessary in light of issues surrounding cite-book or cite-meta? Thanks. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  08:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * what issues are you referring to? Most of them should be resolved by now; let me know if they are any that haven't been. — SGconlaw (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Lemme ask : are there still issues surrounding these templets? If not we can then restore the cite-book version of the templets… ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  09:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * There are no more issues, so I have restored it. Most of the templates I had converted have also been restored, after the problem was fixed. (P.S. I lost my account) --(SodhakSH) 2405:201:300E:287E:4BA:BA27:B0DB:E4E4 10:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * There are no issues. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  10:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)