Template talk:Roman-num

RFD discussion: January 2018
This template is redundant with (which is unused, but seems cleaner), and both with Module:roman numerals. Can't they simply invoke that module? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 21:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Palaestrator verborum sis loquier 🗣 22:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * does seem good? Should we rename the template, and create another template for the reverse function ("roman_to_arabic_t")? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 23:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I think there was a discussion about this recently. Regardless, this module also exists. —*i̯óh₁nC[5] 00:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes indeed (do you still plan on merging the two modules? :p).
 * The template (and the reverse ) is already good to go, so we can safely delete  and  (once it's orphaned; I'll get to it). --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 00:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, that was easy: all the transclusions of were due to its call into another template. Orphaned and nominated for immediate deletion. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 00:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Kill it. —*i̯óh₁nC[5] 00:38, 5 January 2018 (UTC)