Template talk:U:be:у-ў


 * My version wasn't the best, but I really find this too wordy. Couldn't we make it more concise? ? PUC – 19:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * How does it sound now? Benwing2 (talk) 20:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I only wanted to make it consistent with the Ukrainian equivalent (and  - to do). --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Should we fix the Ukrainian equivalents the same way? Benwing2 (talk) 23:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * : I'll take a look. Important is to note that it's у/ў (uk: у/в)+ "consonant". --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Personally, I like the new wording better. PUC – 23:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Name?
This template has two names, and, the latter of which is canonical. I'd like to standardize on one name and eliminate the other; which do you prefer? Benwing2 (talk) 04:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree the latter one is better but pls keep in sync with the Ukrainian equivalent and we probably want a similar one for the Ukrainian і/й alternation (no template exists yet but usage notes). Not sure if we have any apart from the іти́/йти pair. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 04:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, I renamed usages of and deleted the template; similarly I renamed  to . Benwing2 (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * In Ukrainian, the і/й alternation exists not only in іти́/йти but also in some other words, e.g. і/й (and), імовірність/ймовірність (probability). Burzuchius (talk) 19:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Done: . Burzuchius (talk) 10:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Backed by Lua
This is now backed by Lua; as with, you only specify one of the alternants, and the other is automatically derived. Benwing2 (talk) 06:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)