Template talk:alteration

RFDO discussion: April–May 2017
It would be easier to just type it out manually. Not that it's at all clear what it means in its current transclusions anyway. —CodeCat 23:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. I don't see the point of it, and it's being used to format etymologies in a way that's inconsistent with longstanding practice. Comments from other Russian editors? Benwing2 (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, D1gggg seems to be obsessed with creating templates for things that can't just be spelled out. --WikiTiki89 19:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * D1g seems slavishly devoted to that one grammar book. Anything not listed in it gets tagged as "unlisted", etc. Anyway, deleted. - -sche (discuss) 05:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Pointless deletion
You need competence to claim that alterations are not present in Russian lemmas.

Even most useless resources get it:


 * http://rusyaz-online.ru/pravila/korni-s-cheredovanijem
 * http://lingvotech.com/oavlorneslova
 * http://www.yaklass.ru/materiali?mode=lsntheme&themeid=75
 * http://russkiy-na-5.ru/rules/23
 * http://russkiy-na-5.ru/rules/20

d1g (talk) 08:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC)