Template talk:altspell

Template:altspell
Clutters the page, states what should be obvious. Is this necessary? &mdash;Internoob (Disc•Cont) 22:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Utterly pointless. delete -- Liliana • 04:05, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Obvious? How? When I see an "Alternative forms" section, I don't assume all are equally acceptable or common. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually I do, but all the same, shouldn't these be treated on a case-by-case basis? Something like or  seems ideal to me; it's also what we already do. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, the template basically says, "these might be archaisms or they might be used in other dialects" which is the obvious part. It doesn't say that they are equally common. &mdash;Internoob (Disc•Cont) 19:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

RFD failed, only a dozen transclusions, it can be deleted as soon as it is no longer used. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC)