Template talk:ca-plural of

Template:ca-plural of
More templatitis, using multiple templates when one, perfectly good one already exists. Seems to be redundant to. I can understand why would be a good idea if Catalan were highly inflected, but with just singular and plural forms, I don't think it can be justified. NB seems to come from the same era that generated lost of since deleted templates like and. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * No input on this one, but I'm wondering if something similar might apply to ? I've used it quite happily so far, so I'd like to know if this would set a precedent to have that deleted as well. —CodeCat 18:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I note that this template permits a sort parameter, which isn't found in . --EncycloPetey 19:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Not really IMO Codecat, Dutch has more forms than Catalan, at least 4. To EncycloPetey, couldn't we add that to ? That's the sort of thing I have been adding while orphaning, such as


 * I recently came across this template, and now that I've been more involved with Catalan, I'd like to say delete. The point that it has a sort= parameter has some merit, but that can easily be added to . However, I think it's best to use for that. —CodeCat 15:37, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Added  to . Mglovesfun (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. --Yair rand (talk) 17:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Fails, needs to be orphaned. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)