Template talk:ch-noun

Template:ch-noun
Wrong and unused. Chamorro does not have gender, and does not (generally? ever?) form plurals by adding -s. Existing Chamorro noun entries use. (One entry did use this, but it seemed to be erroneous, and has failed RFV.) —Ruakh TALK 02:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It is just a carbon copy of . delete -- Prince Kassad 05:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No, it's a carbon copy of . —Ruakh TALK 05:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Not that it really matters in this case... -- Prince Kassad 08:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Could just do a total rewrite, though. Let me have a go. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * OK (for better clarity), rfd'd version was this. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Still delete, sorry. The template is no longer wrong — thank you — but now it's just a clone of . At some point, our Chamorro editor(s) may want to create an actual that actually does something useful — generates a default plural, say, or uses a specific standardized term for the dual — at which point plain  may become retroactively wrong in existing entries that were using it to mean, unless special pains are taken to make it be backward-compatible. Or, alternatively, they may never want anything like this at all, and they may stick to  because it works with all parts of speech whereas  only works with nouns (and mis-works with adjectives). —Ruakh TALK 09:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Suits me (and I agree with you), note that seems to be a copy of . Mglovesfun (talk) 09:24, 13 September 2010 (UTC)