Template talk:cmn-erhua form of

Doesn't work?
Why doesn't it work? What doesn't work? 23:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Erhua in other topolects

 * since erhua is used in other topolects, like Jin, Wu and formal Cantonese (e.g. 哪兒), do you think the main template should be instead and allow for additional labels to specify topolects? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I suppose so. I'm not sure Cantonese should be included though since formal Cantonese is largely Mandarin read using Cantonese pronunciation. —suzukaze (t・c) 03:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's kinda weird to include Cantonese... — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Support, good idea. If the Cantonese erhua is attested, we should use it. Cantonese dictionaries normally provide readings for all standard Chinese (Mandarin) terms. I think I've come across Wu erhua, even added myself but I don't remember any more. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I support moving it to zh- and removing the Mandarin label from the template (with existing uses having the label manually added). Wyang (talk) 06:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi. Bumping the topic. Erhua forms are also used for Jin, at least,e.g., . Could we probably have a parameter for a lect, if it's not Mandarin or not just Mandarin? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * There's nolb, which removes the label. I think ultimately, we should remove the label from this template, opting for outside of the template. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:14, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've applied that at . --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)