Template talk:comp

I think this template rewording is a little better than "See also" currently in use. But more importantly, using the ucfirst: and lcfirst: magic word keywords, this probably doesn't need parameters for the majority of cases it is needed. --Connel MacKenzie T C 04:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Template:comp
Isn't this redundant to ? TeleComNasSprVen 21:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Nah that's a massive compliment, it's just a terrible template. Used only once in an etymology:


 * In fact, it's supposed to be as  doesn't allow glosses. If it were used, it would be redundant to just writing out whatever the editor wanted to say using text and wiki markup. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

deleted -- Liliana • 02:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)