Template talk:computer languages

Since all its languages' glossaries are deleted or in the process of being deleted, this seems rather superfluous. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * My initial react is to wait for those votes to finish. Appendix:APL looks like it has a slight chance of survival. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * But, you see, if only one of them survives, then there's no point in having the template to navigate to the other ones. --Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if two survive, we don't need a template to link from one to the other: just include a link in the page. Heck, even if three survive. Delete. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Good point; delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Soon to be Speedy deleted. --ElisaVan (talk)