Template talk:de-noun-f-unc

RFDO discussion: February 2014–February 2015

 * former header: Eight template redirects: Special:PrefixIndex/Template:de-noun-

Template:de-noun-n-es-unc
--kc_kennylau (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Pinging you guys because you guys have edited at least one of the aforementioned pages. --kc_kennylau (talk) 08:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Pinging you guys again for there is no answer. --kc_kennylau (talk) 02:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Dejamenpaz. —  [Ric Laurent] — 19:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ¿Que? — Keφr 06:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Nadie salvo ti te puedes dar paz. --kc_kennylau (talk) 07:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep all How is anybody being harmed by template redirects? Template redirects are useful and should be kept  Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 21:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Redirects do cause harm; they cause confusion for the users who have to learn them and what they point to. It adds to the mental load of editing Wiktionary, which is already quite high. 21:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That's a straw-man argument, and anyway, it makes viewing easier Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 21:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Template redirects don't affect viewing a page at all, they only affect editing. 21:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for inviting but I have no strong opinion on this. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 23:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, I guess, for the sake of consistency with other declension templates. — Keφr 06:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * These redirects are named as if they were headword-line templates, but they are not; therefore, they should be deleted. - -sche (discuss) 17:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * These names are common practice. Compare Category:Russian noun inflection-table templates. --WikiTiki89 18:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Only one of these had more than 50 (but under 100) transclusions; the rest all had only a handful. I've orphaned and deleted them. - -sche (discuss) 20:56, 5 February 2015 (UTC)